| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国临床康复|预变性神经移植促进神经再生的动物实验

预变性神经移植促进神经再生的动物实验

李存孝 李稔生 殷琦

中国临床康复2006,Vol.10Issue(17):158-160,插8,4.
中国临床康复2006,Vol.10Issue(17):158-160,插8,4.

预变性神经移植促进神经再生的动物实验

Animal experiment of nerve regeneration promoted by predegenerated nerve graft

李存孝 1李稔生 2殷琦2

作者信息

  • 1. 解放军第四军医大学唐都医院全军骨科中心,陕西省,西安市,710038
  • 2. 解放军第四军医大学西京医院骨科,陕西省,西安市,710032
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many studies thought that predegenerated nerve graft (PNG) is superior to fresh nerve graft (FNG).OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of predegeneration on nerve functional recovery from histological,immunocytochemical,electrophysiological and microstructural aspects based on predegenerated nerve graft to common peroneal nerve at different time periods.DESIGN: Grouping and controlled experiment SETTING: General Center of Department of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University of Chinese PLA MATERIALS: Totally 42 rabbits, with body mass ranged from 2.3 to 2.6 kg,of either gender, were used in this experiment METHODS: This experiment was conducted at the General Center of Department of Orthopaedics, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University of Chinese PLA in 1996. Totally 42 rabbits were divided into 7experiment groups A, B, C, D, E, F, G for nerve grafts of different predegenerated periods. In groups A, B, C, D, E, F, both side of the rabbits peroneal nerves were allowed to undergo predegeneration for 0, 4, 7, 14,21, 28 days; common peroneal nerve of the rabbits in the Groups B, C, D,E and F were cut off; The skin of the animals in Group A was cut open,exposed but the nerve was not cut off. Only the right common peroneal nerve in Group G was cut off. The cut nerve in Groups B, C, D, E and F were re-exposed respectively at 4,7,14,21 and 28 days after operation. 1.5 cm-length degenerated distal nerve segment was chosen for transplantation and reparation contrafateral nerve. Two sides were transplanted mutually. Common peroneal nerve in Group A was re-exposed 2 weeks later, 1.5 cm-length nerve segment was cut in the same way for mutual transplantation. In Group G, the predegenerated nerve segment of the right side was transplanted to the fresh receptor of the left side 2weeks later. The fresh nerve segment of left segment was transplanted to degenerated receptor of the right side.Histological observation, passing rate of axon counting shortened significantly the initial delay period of axonal regeneration (from 3.04 to 0.04 day), accelerated the axonal growing rate (1.73-2.59 mm/d)as compared with FNG; Electrophysiological study showed that N-MCV in the Groups D, C and B was the fastest, followed by Group A and Group E,Group F was the slowest; there was no significant difference in passing rate appeared in the animals of Group D after operation, middle-quantity of myelin sheaths appeared in the Group C and few myelin sheaths in the Groups A, B, and F.CONCLUSION: PNG excels FNG at decreasing initial delay period of axonal regeneration, promoting regeneration velocity of axon, boosting up passing rate of axon and enhancing N-MCV. Nerve grafting for predegenerated for 14 days can enhance significantly nerve regeneration than fresh nerve grafts, then grafts degenerated for 7 days. Grafts degenerated for 4 and 21 days can also enhance axonal regeneration lightly.

关键词

神经再生/移植/动物

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

李存孝,李稔生,殷琦..预变性神经移植促进神经再生的动物实验[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(17):158-160,插8,4.

中国临床康复

OA北大核心CSCDCSTPCD

2095-4344

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文