| 注册
首页|期刊导航|临床骨科杂志|单侧外固定器与3种内固定治疗胫腓骨骨折的比较

单侧外固定器与3种内固定治疗胫腓骨骨折的比较

陈晓明 曲志国 刘卓

临床骨科杂志2001,Vol.4Issue(1):29-30,2.
临床骨科杂志2001,Vol.4Issue(1):29-30,2.

单侧外固定器与3种内固定治疗胫腓骨骨折的比较

Comparision of unilateral external fixaor and three kinds of internal fixation methods in treatment of tibiofibular fracture

陈晓明 1曲志国 1刘卓1

作者信息

  • 1. 四平市中心医院骨科,
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To evaluate advantage of unilateral external fixator in treatment of tibiofibular fracture.Methods The one-side external fixation was compared with three kinds of internal fixa tion, and the complication and therapeutic failure rate of each group were analy zed statistically. Results The therapeutic failure rate was as follows: steel plate fixation group, 10.44%; intramedullary nail fixation grou p, 2.7%; simple screw wire fixation group, 3/5; and unilateral external fixator group, only 0.89%. Conclusion Unilateral external fixator in treatment of tibiofibular fracture embodies both the advantage of conservative therapy and internal fixation treatment, and may avoid the disadvantage of them. It can be taken as the first choice in present treatment of tibiofibular fractu res.

关键词

外固定器/胫骨骨折/腓骨骨折/骨折固定术,内

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

陈晓明,曲志国,刘卓..单侧外固定器与3种内固定治疗胫腓骨骨折的比较[J].临床骨科杂志,2001,4(1):29-30,2.

临床骨科杂志

1008-0287

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文