中国人兽共患病杂志2001，Vol.17Issue(1)：56-58,3.
几种幽门螺杆菌检测方法比较
COMPARISON OF THE DIFFERENT DETECTIVE METHODS FOR HELICOBATER PYLORI
陈玉丽 1陈奕贵 1吴婷 1林经安 1刘豫瑞 1王承党 1潘玉凤1
作者信息
- 1. 福建医科大学附属第一医院 福州，350005
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Aim To explore the differences and clinic value of the differentdetective methods for Helicobacter pylori(Hp). Methods Detecting anti-Hp-IgG antibody in blood and saliva of patients with DIGFA.Decting Hp infection in biopsy specimen of gastric mucosa with RUT and PCR-Hp-DNA at the same time.Results The anti-Hp-IgG antibody in blood, anti-Hp-IgG antibody in saliva, RUT in gastric mucosa and PCR-Hp-DNA in gastric mucosa, the positive rate was 84%, 58%, 59%, 62%, respectively, while the correct rate for diagnosing Hp infection is 72.72%, 90%, 91%, 92%.The sensitivity is 94.64%, 85.71%, 87.50%, 94.64%. The specificity was 35.29%, 97.06%, 97.06%,91.18%. The positive predictive rate was 70.67%, 92.31%, 92.45%,94.64%. The negative predictive rate is 80.00%, 86.84%,89.19%, 91.18%. Conclusions The correct rate, sensitivity and specificity of anti-Hp-IgG in salviva with DIGFA are similar to gastric mucosa with RUT. Both of these two methods are non-invasive, simple, rapoid, cheap and adaptable to clinic test. Anti-Hp-IgG antibody in blood is suitable for epidemic investigation. PCR-Hp-DNA is suitable for scientific researches.关键词
幽门螺杆菌/检测方法分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
陈玉丽,陈奕贵,吴婷,林经安,刘豫瑞,王承党,潘玉凤..几种幽门螺杆菌检测方法比较[J].中国人兽共患病杂志,2001,17(1):56-58,3.
