| 注册
首页|期刊导航|国际医药卫生导报|低压液相层析法与离子交换层析法测定糖化血红蛋白的比较

低压液相层析法与离子交换层析法测定糖化血红蛋白的比较

马江涛 陈昕 黄明

国际医药卫生导报2010,Vol.16Issue(17):2137-2140,4.
国际医药卫生导报2010,Vol.16Issue(17):2137-2140,4.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2010.17.027

低压液相层析法与离子交换层析法测定糖化血红蛋白的比较

Low performance liquid chromatography versus ion exchange chromatography for detecting HboA1c

马江涛 1陈昕 1黄明1

作者信息

  • 1. 518020,深圳市人民医院检验科
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To study the methodological difference between low performance liquid chromatography (LPLC) and ion exchange chromatography (IEC) for detecting HbA1c. Methods We examined the accuracy, precision, interfering factors, and relativity of low performance liquid chromatography and ion exchange chromatography for detecting HbA1c. Results The average CV value for LPLC was 3.01%in batch assay and 3.05% in day to day asay, while that for IEC was 4.93% in batch assay and 5.23% in day to day assay. The average recovery rate was101.8% for LPLC and 107.4% for IEC while the true value of HbA1c was 4.6%, 7.9%, and 12.8%. The relativity of LPLC and IEC was described as the following formulas:Y = 0.982X-0.351, with no statistical differences (P>0.05). Bilirubin, triglycerides, and cholesterol had no interference for LPLC and IEC. Conclusion LPLC and IEC are simple and sensitive in detecting HbA1c.

关键词

糖化血红蛋白/低压液相层析/离子交换层析

Key words

HbA1c/Low performance liquid chromatography/Ion exchange chromatography

引用本文复制引用

马江涛,陈昕,黄明..低压液相层析法与离子交换层析法测定糖化血红蛋白的比较[J].国际医药卫生导报,2010,16(17):2137-2140,4.

国际医药卫生导报

1007-1245

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文