国际医药卫生导报2010，Vol.16Issue(11)：1313-1316,4.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2010.11.010
两种术式治疗股骨转子间骨折的对比观察
Comparison of two surgical procedures for intertrochanteric fractures
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the efficicay of two surgical procedures for intertrochanteric fracture, and to explore the best surgical treatment for intertrochanteric fracture. Methods 60 patients were randomly assigned to receive surgical procedure either with dynamic hip screws (DHS group, 30 patients) or with proximal femoral nails (PFN group, 30 patients) The healing time of fracture, degree of postoperative functional recovery of the hip joint, and incidence of complications. Results All of the patients were followed up. The healing time of fracture, rate of ideal functional recovery of the hip joint, and incidence of complications differed significantly between DHS group and PFN group([13.09±2.17] weeks vs. [10.35 ± 3.28] weeks, 84.34%, vs. 90.00%, 16.67% vs. 13.34%; P<0.05 for three comparisons). Conclusions Surgery is the optimal option in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. The procedure with proximal femoral nails is superior to that with dynamic hip screws.关键词
股骨转子间骨折/手术治疗/手术选择Key words
Intertrochanteric fractures/ Surgical treatment/ Surgical option引用本文复制引用
黎全猛..两种术式治疗股骨转子间骨折的对比观察[J].国际医药卫生导报,2010,16(11):1313-1316,4.
