实用医学杂志2011，Vol.27Issue(6)：984-986,3.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2011.06.024
常规IVF受精失败后行补救ICSI与直接ICSI的临床比较分析
The value of rescue ICSI versus that of direct ICSI following fertilization failure in conventional IVF
戴蜜蜜 1葛红山 1黄朝霞 1吕杰强1
作者信息
- 1. 325000,温州医学院附属第二医院不孕不育生殖医学中心
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To explore the clinical value of rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (Rescue ICSI) following fertilization failure in conventional IVF.Methods 29 rescue ICSI cycles following total fertilization failure in conventional IVF (group Ⅰ ) and 70 direct ICSI cycles (group Ⅱ ) were performed in our hospital between June 2009 and December 2009.The clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.Results The normal fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, and clinical pregnancy rate did not differ significantly between the two groups [(80.8 ± 16.2)％vs.(82.9 ± 15.9)％, (76.6 ± 24.6)％vs.(72.7 ± 24.4)％, and 37.9％vs.41.4％;P ＞ 0.05].There was a significant difference in the cleavage embryo rate between rescue ICSI than direct ICSI [(91.7 ± 13.6)％ vs.(97.4 ± 6.8)％, P ＜ 0.05].Conclusions Rescue ICSI may improve the fertilization rate and clinical outcomes.It can be performed after fertilization failure in conventional IVF.关键词
受精,体外/受精失败/补救ICSI/ICSI引用本文复制引用
戴蜜蜜,葛红山,黄朝霞,吕杰强..常规IVF受精失败后行补救ICSI与直接ICSI的临床比较分析[J].实用医学杂志,2011,27(6):984-986,3.
