| 注册
首页|期刊导航|浙江医学|MRI和物理检查对前交叉韧带完全断裂的诊断效果评价

MRI和物理检查对前交叉韧带完全断裂的诊断效果评价

薛恩兴 潘骏

浙江医学2011,Vol.33Issue(2):192-194,3.
浙江医学2011,Vol.33Issue(2):192-194,3.

MRI和物理检查对前交叉韧带完全断裂的诊断效果评价

The diagnostic value of MRI and special physical tests for anterior cruciate ligament rupture

薛恩兴 1潘骏1

作者信息

  • 1. 325027,温州医学院附属第二医院骨科
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To assess the diagnostic value of MRI and special physical tests for complete rupture of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Methods The clinical data of 88 patients diagnosed as knee ligament injury and admitted from March 2008 to February 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Before surgery, all injured knee laxity was examined by MRI, the anterior drawer test (ADT), the Lachman test and arthroscopy. Result of arthroscopy was used as gold standard for defining ACL complete rupture. The sensitivity, specificity accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value among MRI and the special physicaltests were evaluated and compared. Results There were 61 cases vith ACL complete rupture in 88 cases determined by arthroscopy. For MRI, ADT and Lachman test in diagnosis of ACL complete rupture, the sensitivity was 85.2%, 80.3% and 83.6%, respectively; specificity was 66.7%, 81.5% and 77.8%, respectively; accuracy was 79.5%, 80.7% and 81.8%, respectively;positive predictive value was 85.2%, 90.7% and 89.5%, respectively; negative predictive value was 66.7%, 64.7% and 67.7%, respectively; positive likelihood ratio was 2.56, 4.34 and 3.77, respectively and negative likelihood ratio was 0.222, 0.24 and 0.21,respectively. Conclusion Among 3 methods, ADT is of most value in diagnosis of ACL complete rupture, and the Lachman test is better in excluding the diagnosis.

关键词

前交叉韧带/完全断裂/MRI/物理检查

引用本文复制引用

薛恩兴,潘骏..MRI和物理检查对前交叉韧带完全断裂的诊断效果评价[J].浙江医学,2011,33(2):192-194,3.

浙江医学

OACSTPCD

1006-2785

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文