| 注册

有机质生烃动力学模型对比

王民 卢双舫 董奇 薛海涛 黄立明

中国石油大学学报(自然科学版)2011,Vol.35Issue(3):12-18,7.
中国石油大学学报(自然科学版)2011,Vol.35Issue(3):12-18,7.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2011.03.003

有机质生烃动力学模型对比

Comparison on hydrocarbon generation kinetic models

王民 1卢双舫 2董奇 2薛海涛 2黄立明3

作者信息

  • 1. 北京大学地球与空间科学学院,北京,100871
  • 2. 东北石油大学地球科学学院,黑龙江,大庆,163318
  • 3. 中粮生化能源(肇东)有限公司,黑龙江,肇东,151100
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Different kinetic models including overall reaction model, normal distribution model, Weibull distribution model and discrete distribution model were established, and kinetic parameters were optimized based on systematic research of hydrocarbon generation kinetics experiment for twenty-three source rocks.Then the optimized results and hydrocarbon generation kinetic characteristics of different type kerogen were compared.The results show that Gaussian distribution model has the worst fitting effect, followed by overall reaction model and Weibull distribution model, and the discrete distribution model has the best fitting effect.Apparent activation energy increases gradually with the pre-exponential factors increasing, and the apparent activation energy of type Ⅱ2-Ⅲ kerogen is larger than that of type Ⅰ, and that of type Ⅲ is the smallest.It is recommend the parallel first-order kinetic model with a discrete distribution activation energies be used when the hydrocarbon generation kinetic method is applied to appraise oil-gas resources and to study hydrocarbon generation kinetic characteristics and the isotope fractionation kinetics.

关键词

动力学模型/动力学参数/表观活化能/指前因子

Key words

kinetic model/ kinetic parameters/ apparent activation energy/ pre-exponential factor

分类

天文与地球科学

引用本文复制引用

王民,卢双舫,董奇,薛海涛,黄立明..有机质生烃动力学模型对比[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(3):12-18,7.

基金项目

国家自然科学基金项目(40972101) (40972101)

国家油气重大专项课题(2008ZX05007-001和20085004-003) (2008ZX05007-001和20085004-003)

国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2009CB219306和2006CB202307) (2009CB219306和2006CB202307)

中国石油大学学报(自然科学版)

OA北大核心CSCDCSTPCD

1673-5005

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文