国际医药卫生导报2011，Vol.17Issue(7)：795-797,3.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2011.07.010
食管造影定位房间隔穿刺点两种方法的比较
Comparison of two methods of esophageal radiography for locating transseptal puncture points
关信民 1赵强 1林梓卿 1何芸 1吴同果1
作者信息
- 1. 510220,广州市红十字会医院,暨南大学第四附属医院心血管内科
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective Both meglumine diatrizoate and barium suffate are used as the contrast agent during esophageal radiography. We investigate which contrast agent is better in locating transseptal puncture points in patients undergoing percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty ( PBMV ). Methods A total of 350 patients were randomized to receive oral meglumine diatrizoate ( study group ), or barium sulfate as a contrast ( control group ) during esophageal radiography. Results The successful rate of locating puncture points and that of trarsseptal puncture were markedly higher in the study group and in the control group ( 97.1% vs. 90.9%, P＜ 0.05; and 95.4% vs. 87.4%, P＜ 0.01 ). The mean surgical duration was significantly shorter in the study group than in the control group [( 47 ± 18 )min vs.( 41 ± 16 )rmin, P＜ 0.01]. Conclusions Meglumine diatrizoate is better for locating of transeptal puncture points during esophageal radiography.关键词
食管造影/房间隔穿刺/定位Key words
Esophageal radiography/Transseptal puncture/Location引用本文复制引用
关信民,赵强,林梓卿,何芸,吴同果..食管造影定位房间隔穿刺点两种方法的比较[J].国际医药卫生导报,2011,17(7):795-797,3.
