| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国组织工程研究与临床康复|CD34及CD105两种微血管标记物在瘢痕微血管构筑中的比较

CD34及CD105两种微血管标记物在瘢痕微血管构筑中的比较

黄如林 梁杰 夏琼平 黄绮梨 吴志贤

中国组织工程研究与临床康复2011,Vol.15Issue(11):1977-1980,4.
中国组织工程研究与临床康复2011,Vol.15Issue(11):1977-1980,4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2011.11.019

CD34及CD105两种微血管标记物在瘢痕微血管构筑中的比较

Comparison of two microvessels markers CD34 and CD105 in microvasculature of pathological scars

黄如林 1梁杰 2夏琼平 1黄绮梨 1吴志贤2

作者信息

  • 1. 珠海市第二人民医院整形美容科,广东省珠海市,519000
  • 2. 广东医学院附属医院整形外科研究所,广东省湛江市,524001
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is not a reliable neovascularization marker for pathological scar. Though CD34 and CD105 are considered to be a credible vascular endothelial cell marker, they have own specially features.OBJECTIVE: The difference between the two microvessels marker CD34 and CD105 in microvasculature of pathological scar.METHODS: Immunohistochemistcal staining for the CD34 and CD105 was performed in normal skin tissue specimens,non-pathological scar tissue specimens, hypertrophic scar tissue specimens and keloid tissue specimens, the internal diameter (ID) of microvessels marked by CD34 and CD105 and the expression area of CD34 and CD105 were measured by image analysis software Moticlmages Advanced 3.2, the morphology and distribution characteristics of mirovessels were analyzed after the photos taken by image acquisition instruments.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In all of specimens, the ID of microvessels marked by CD34 and CD105 were (73.14±17.85) μm and (27.91±5.86) μm, respectively, the microvessels marked by CD105 were newer than the microvessels marked by CD34. As an endothelial marker of angiogenesis, CD105 is a more special marker for neovascularization than CD34 in pathological scar,CD105 could be considered to be a credible neovascularization marker.

关键词

微血管构筑/CD34/CD105/病理性瘢痕/皮肤

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

黄如林,梁杰,夏琼平,黄绮梨,吴志贤..CD34及CD105两种微血管标记物在瘢痕微血管构筑中的比较[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2011,15(11):1977-1980,4.

基金项目

广东省自然科学基金项目项目(06028957). (06028957)

中国组织工程研究与临床康复

OACSCDCSTPCD

2095-4344

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文