四川医学2011，Vol.32Issue(8)：1263-1264,2.
两种液体复苏方式在抢救多发伤创伤失血性休克中的临床研究
To investigate the clinical significance of two fluid resuscitation on wounded hemorrhagic shock
彭艳 1彭雪刚 1文刚 1王俊英1
作者信息
- 1. 仁寿县人民医院ICU,四川,仁寿,620500
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To investigate the clinical significance of aggressive fluid resuscitation ( AFR) and limited fluidresuscitation( LFR) on wounded hemorrhagic shock. Methods 62 patients were analyzed and compare cure rate, mortality rate and disseminated intravascular congulation ( DIC ) 、acute respiratory distress syndrome ( ARDS) 、 multiple organ dysfunction syndrome ( MODS) between AFR group ( n = 31 ) and LFR group ( n = 31 ) . Results Average transfusion quantities of AFR group were ( 2790 ±536) ml. Cure rate was 71. 0％ , mortality rate was 29. 0％ . Average transfusion quantities of LFR group were ( 1802 ± 313 ) ml . Cure rate was 83. 9,mortality rate was 16. 1％ ,the comparison of two groups DIC、ARDS、MODS were much significant different( P ＜ 0. 05 ) ，there was statistically significant different of cure rate and mortality rate between the two groups( P ＜ 0. 05 ) .Conclusion LFR is superior to AFR in operative intervention for patients with wounded hemorrhagic shock.关键词
创伤失血性休克/积极液体复苏/限制性液体复苏Key words
wounded hemorrhagic shock / aggressive fluid resuscitation/limited fluid resuscitation分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
彭艳,彭雪刚,文刚,王俊英..两种液体复苏方式在抢救多发伤创伤失血性休克中的临床研究[J].四川医学,2011,32(8):1263-1264,2.
