| 注册
首页|期刊导航|辐射防护|静电收集法测量氡浓度的两种技术路线比较

静电收集法测量氡浓度的两种技术路线比较

谭延亮 肖德涛 赵桂芝 周青芝 单健

辐射防护2011,Vol.31Issue(6):376-378,384,4.
辐射防护2011,Vol.31Issue(6):376-378,384,4.

静电收集法测量氡浓度的两种技术路线比较

Comparison of Two Kind Technology Methods of Electrostatic Collection for Radon Measurement

谭延亮 1肖德涛 2赵桂芝 2周青芝 2单健2

作者信息

  • 1. 衡阳师范学院物电系,湖南衡阳421008
  • 2. 南华大学核科学技术学院,湖南衡阳421001
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

The continuous radon monitor,based on the electrostatic collection,has been widely used at present.However,the collection efficiency of the positively-charged radon progeny in the electrost aticfield is influenced by air humidity.By analyzing the two technical routes,we find that this problem canbe solved by using drying tubes and the measured value is of high accuracy,but the delay effect of measurement from the gap of the tube increase at the same pump flow rate.Using the temperature and humidity correction curve will lead to additional measurement error due to temperature and humidity measurement,but the delay time of measurement can be minor,and the desiccant does not need replacement.It is especially suitable for unattended long-term continuous measurement of radon concentration.

关键词

/静电收集法/干燥管/温、湿度修正曲线

Key words

radon/electrostatic collection/drying tube/corrected curve of temperature and humidity

分类

能源科技

引用本文复制引用

谭延亮,肖德涛,赵桂芝,周青芝,单健..静电收集法测量氡浓度的两种技术路线比较[J].辐射防护,2011,31(6):376-378,384,4.

基金项目

国家自然科学基金资助项目 ()

湖南省自然科学基金资助项目 ()

湖南省研究生科研创新项目 ()

衡阳师范学院英才支持计划 ()

衡阳师范学院科学基金 ()

辐射防护

OA北大核心CSCDCSTPCD

1000-8187

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文