| 注册
首页|期刊导航|建筑与文化|高架桥,拆除还是保留?

高架桥,拆除还是保留?

李思迪

建筑与文化Issue(10):110-112,3.
建筑与文化Issue(10):110-112,3.

高架桥,拆除还是保留?

Viaduct,Demolition or Reservations?

李思迪1

作者信息

  • 1. 浙江大学建筑工程学院
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Currently in China,planning theorists have a voice,that the viaduct is the product of a process of urban development,which will eventually be removed and demolished,and the Cheonggyecheon restoration project as important evidence for this conclusion.Meanwhile,in New York's the High Line Park case,the emergence of another way to deal with abandoned viaduct,retaining the viaduct as the use of the park on foot,rather than simply removed violently.Based on case studies,the author tries to find five factors,which is hoped for being taken as references and experiences for the development of the viaduct in the future.

关键词

清溪川/高线公园/保留/复兴改造/高架桥

Key words

Cheonggyecheon/The High Line Park/Reservations/Restoration and Reconstruction/Viaduct

分类

建筑与水利

引用本文复制引用

李思迪..高架桥,拆除还是保留?[J].建筑与文化,2011,(10):110-112,3.

建筑与文化

1672-4909

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文