| 注册
首页|期刊导航|临床口腔医学杂志|三种种植系统周边骨质吸收的对比研究

三种种植系统周边骨质吸收的对比研究

程亚楠 徐普 朱亚丽 李晓敏 毛小泉 王彬娉

临床口腔医学杂志2011,Vol.27Issue(12):742-745,4.
临床口腔医学杂志2011,Vol.27Issue(12):742-745,4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-1634.2011.12.015

三种种植系统周边骨质吸收的对比研究

A comparative study to the marginal bone loss of three implant systems.

程亚楠 1徐普 1朱亚丽 1李晓敏 1毛小泉 2王彬娉2

作者信息

  • 1. 中南大学湘雅医学院附属海口医院口腔中心·海南省口腔医学中心 口腔种植科 海南海口 570208
  • 2. 中南大学湘雅医学院附属海口医院口腔中心·海南省口腔医学中心 牙周黏膜病科 海南海口 570208
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective: Hie purpose of this study is to evaluate the difference of marginal bone loss around the implant with butt-joint or platform-switched implant system on the panoramic radiograph. Method: 54 butt-joint implants (Noble Replace) . 14 small platform-switched implants (Osstem CS). 25 oblique style platform switched implants (Bicon) were consecutively placed. Panoramic radiograph was taken at immediately after implant placement and 3 months after functional loading. Marginal bone level and marginal bone loss were measured on the panoramic radiograph. All data was statistical analysis by SPSS14.0 software. Result: 3 months after functional loading, the mean bone absorptive amount on the mesial and distal of the bult-joint implants were 1.88 mm±1.49 mm and 1.81 mm±1.34 mm;obligue style platform switched implants were -0.68 mm±0.99 mm and -1.17 mm±1.37 mm; small platform swifched implants were 0.53 mm±1.48 mm and 0.74 mm±0.99 mm. Three implant systems were comparison of pair wise* their difference were shown to be significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Platform switching technology can reduce the marginal bone absorptive amount around dental implant; moreover) different platform switching designs have strikingly different ability in saving the bone around the implant.

关键词

牙种植/边缘骨吸收/平台转换

Key words

dental implant/ marginal bone loss/ platform switching

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

程亚楠,徐普,朱亚丽,李晓敏,毛小泉,王彬娉..三种种植系统周边骨质吸收的对比研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2011,27(12):742-745,4.

基金项目

海南省2008年度重点科技计划(080217) (080217)

临床口腔医学杂志

OACSTPCD

1003-1634

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文