中国美容医学2012，Vol.21Issue(1)：19-21,3.
一次性包皮环切吻合器与包皮环扎和传统包皮环切术的疗效比较
Clinical efficiency analysis between Micro-injury Peritomy Anastomoses Device, foreskin cerclage and the conventional circumcision
彭友林1
作者信息
- 1. 湖北省孝感市中心医院烧伤整形外科,湖北孝感432000
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical efficiency between Micro-injury Peritomy Anastomoses Device.foreskin cerclage and the conventional circumcision. Methods The patients of phimosis and redundant prepuce were taken operations with peritomy anastomoses device.foreskin cerclage.conventional circumcision.they were compared in aspects of before operation.between operation and after operation. Results Compred with the conventional surgery group and foreskin cerclage group.the peritomy anastomoses device group experienced more costly but have more advantages in other aspects. Conclusions The procedure with peritomy anastomoses device is much more simpler, safer.achieving without suturing,and good outlook as well.lt is worth popularizing.关键词
包皮环吻合器/包皮环扎术/包皮环切术/包茎/包皮过长Key words
peritomy anastomoses device/ foreskin cerclage/ circumcision/phimosis/ redundant prepuce分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
彭友林..一次性包皮环切吻合器与包皮环扎和传统包皮环切术的疗效比较[J].中国美容医学,2012,21(1):19-21,3.
