| 注册
首页|期刊导航|河北医学|带锁髓内钉与锁定加压钢板治疗肱骨干骨折的临床对比研究

带锁髓内钉与锁定加压钢板治疗肱骨干骨折的临床对比研究

张锦锋 刘国东 叶登花 杨道能 李志亮 冯勇泉 高伟东

河北医学2012,Vol.18Issue(5):574-577,4.
河北医学2012,Vol.18Issue(5):574-577,4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2012.05.003

带锁髓内钉与锁定加压钢板治疗肱骨干骨折的临床对比研究

Clinical Comparison of the Effect of Humeral Shaft Fracture Treated with Intramedullary Nail and Locking Compression Plat

张锦锋 1刘国东 1叶登花 1杨道能 1李志亮 1冯勇泉 1高伟东1

作者信息

  • 1. 广东省河源市东源县人民医院,广东,东源,517500
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective:To explore a reasonable treatment for humeral shaft fracture by comparison of effect between intramedullary nail and licking compression plat (LCP). Method:In all 58 patients with humeral shaft fractures, 34 cases were treated with intramedullary nail fixation and 24 cases were treated with LCP fixation. And then compared the two groups in terms of the blood loss, operative time,hospital stay time, rate of bone healing in half years after operation, clinical effect evaluation and postoperative complications. Result:There was significantly different in the blood loss and mean operative time between two groups(P<0. 01) ; There was no significantly different in the shoulder and elbow function after operation between two groups ( P>0. 05 ) ; There was no significant difference in the rate of incidence of complicationafter the operation between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: The intramedullary nail and LCP have both advantages and disadvantages, both are good internal method for humeral shaft fracture if operation indications are controlled strictly.

关键词

带锁髓内钉/锁定加压钢板/肱骨干骨折

Key words

Intramedullary nail/ Locking compression plat/ Humeral shaflfracture

引用本文复制引用

张锦锋,刘国东,叶登花,杨道能,李志亮,冯勇泉,高伟东..带锁髓内钉与锁定加压钢板治疗肱骨干骨折的临床对比研究[J].河北医学,2012,18(5):574-577,4.

河北医学

OACSTPCD

1006-6233

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文