| 注册
首页|期刊导航|国际医药卫生导报|经桡动脉与股动脉途径行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的对比分析

经桡动脉与股动脉途径行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的对比分析

杨伟民 欧文森 李绍波

国际医药卫生导报2012,Vol.18Issue(8):1162-1165,4.
国际医药卫生导报2012,Vol.18Issue(8):1162-1165,4.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2012.08.042

经桡动脉与股动脉途径行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的对比分析

Contrast analysis of means of radial artery and femoral artery percutaneous coronary intervention

杨伟民 1欧文森 1李绍波1

作者信息

  • 1. 526040 高要市人民医院心血管内科
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To analyze the effectiveness,feasibility and safety of the radial artery and femoral artery approach percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods 272 cases of AMI patients were selected,136 cases by radial artery,136 cases by femoral artery approach line PCI.Operative time,surgical success rate and complications of surgical cases were compared.Results The imaging time,operative time,success rate,the amount of contrast agent used,exposure time,PCI success rate of two groups had no significant difference(P > 0.05).Puncture time and the number of cases changing surgery way of the radial artery group were significantly higher than that of the femoral artery group,while after bed time was lower( P> 0.05 ).The incidence of postoperative complications of the femoral artery group (27.9%) was significantly higher than that of the radial artery group (8.8%).Conclusion The clinical efficacy of the radial artery and the femoral artery through PCI is similar,but after radial artery PCI peripheral vascular complications and fewer complications associated with bed rest,with easy bleeding,the patient activity is not restricted,and faster recovery,shorter hospital stay advantages in clinical application.

关键词

桡动脉/股动脉/经皮冠状动脉介入治疗/手术途径/并发症

Key words

Radial artery/Femoral artery/Percutaneous coronary intervention/Surgical approach/Complication

引用本文复制引用

杨伟民,欧文森,李绍波..经桡动脉与股动脉途径行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的对比分析[J].国际医药卫生导报,2012,18(8):1162-1165,4.

国际医药卫生导报

1007-1245

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文