| 注册
首页|期刊导航|口腔颌面外科杂志|下颌低位阻生第三磨牙两种拔除方法的临床效果比较

下颌低位阻生第三磨牙两种拔除方法的临床效果比较

方文静 王正伦 胡凌洁 徐明稳 李富彬

口腔颌面外科杂志2012,Vol.22Issue(1):53-55,3.
口腔颌面外科杂志2012,Vol.22Issue(1):53-55,3.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2012.01.013

下颌低位阻生第三磨牙两种拔除方法的临床效果比较

Odontotomy in the Management of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar

方文静 1王正伦 1胡凌洁 1徐明稳 1李富彬1

作者信息

  • 1. 宜宾市第二医院口腔科,四川宜宾644000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

[Abstract] Objective: To assess the superiority of high-speed air turbine handpiece odontotomy in extraction of impacted mandibular third molar. Methods: Teeth extraction were randomly divided into two groups. Croup A, 195 impacted mandibular third molars were extracted using high-speed air turbine handpieces odontotomy; group B, 165 using traditional chisel leverage as the control group. Operating time, postoperative pain, facial edema, limitation of mouth opening, and incidence of dry socket were recorded. All statistical analysis were carried out with SPSS 13.0 for Windows. We used the Student t test to examine the differences. Results: There was significant difference between the two groups in operating time, aches, postoperative edema, limitation of mouth opening and incidence of dry socket (P<0.05). Conclusion: High speed air turbine handpiece odontotomy applying in extraction of impacted teeth can efficiently shortened operation time with fewer complications and easier manipulation.

关键词

磨裂沟法/高速涡轮/下颌骨/第三磨牙

Key words

cut obliquely/ high speed air turbine handpiece/ mandibular/ impacted third molar

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

方文静,王正伦,胡凌洁,徐明稳,李富彬..下颌低位阻生第三磨牙两种拔除方法的临床效果比较[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2012,22(1):53-55,3.

口腔颌面外科杂志

OACSTPCD

1005-4979

访问量3
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文