四川医学2012，Vol.33Issue(3)：408-410,3.
“清醒”状态下的无痛肠镜与传统无痛肠镜的临床对比研究
A study about clinic effect comparison on traditional painless colonal endscope and painless colonal endscope under the state of “awake”
刘宏锦 1胡昕 2刘庆2
作者信息
- 1. 泸州医学院附属医院麻醉科,四川泸州646000
- 2. 泸州医学院附属中医院麻醉科,四川泸州646000
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To explore the advantage of painless colonal endoscope under the awake state within "deep analgesia" compared with traditional painless colonal endscope. Methods Choose 145 patients in our hospital for endoscopic check from 2010/4 to 2011/10. The observation group (75 patients) receive parecoxib and raceanisodamine hydrochloride with fentanyl for "deep analgesia" and then go endoscopic check; another control group (70 patients) receive traditional propofol compound fentanyl and then go endoscopic check. To observe the heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory conditions and sober time, postoperative adverse reactions, observation time after leaving room and patients'satisfaction. Results The heart rate change is not obvious (P <0.05) , changes in blood pressure, breath rate and blood oxygen saturation is obvious (P >0.05) ; observation time after leaving room and sober time after operation are less than that in control group ( P < 0. 05 ) ; the total incidence of postoperative adverse reaction in observation group are more than that in control group (P <0. 05 ) ; There is no significance of satisfaction between two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Parecoxib and raceanisodamine hydrochloride with fentanyl for "deep analgesia" and then going endoscopic check could not only be painless, but also avoid the inhibition of traditional painless colonal endoscope to breath and circulation system, worth further promotion.关键词
无痛肠镜/清醒/深镇痛/深镇静Key words
painless colonal endoscope/ awake/ deep analgesia/ deep calm分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
刘宏锦,胡昕,刘庆..“清醒”状态下的无痛肠镜与传统无痛肠镜的临床对比研究[J].四川医学,2012,33(3):408-410,3.
