| 注册
首页|期刊导航|生物骨科材料与临床研究|双侧臀肌挛缩术后两种不同固定方式比较

双侧臀肌挛缩术后两种不同固定方式比较

刘朝晖 瞿锡祥 向宏富

生物骨科材料与临床研究2012,Vol.9Issue(3):39-40,2.
生物骨科材料与临床研究2012,Vol.9Issue(3):39-40,2.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5972.2012.03.013

双侧臀肌挛缩术后两种不同固定方式比较

Comparison therapeutic effect of two kinds of fixation with gluteal muscle contracture afteroperation

刘朝晖 1瞿锡祥 1向宏富1

作者信息

  • 1. 湖南湘西州人民医院骨科,湖南吉首,416000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective Comparison therapeutic effect of flex hip and knee with gypsum fixation and both knees and hip bind fixation of both sides gluteal muscle contracture afteroperation. Methods Contrastive analysis 67 cases of bilateral gluteal muscle contracture patients of Our hospital between 1995 to 2009. 32 cases of group A , adopted flex hip and knee with gypsum fixation afteroperation; 35 cases of group B, adopted both knees and hip bind fixation afteroperation, and put soft pillow under knees. Flex hip and knees, deep squatting functional exercise in early. All cases under the same operation that released the pathological tissues completely. The surgical procedures are used along the direction of the gluteus maximus traveling oblique incision, abscise the fibering gluteus. Evaluation hip function of two groups, Comparison therapeutic effect of two groups. Result All cases were follow up for 6 months to 10 years, average 5 years. In group A, 16 were Excellent, 14 were good, 2 were not good; In group B, 30 were Excellent, 5 were good. Group B better than Group A . Conclusion Therapeutic effect of both knees and hip bind fixation outstrip flex hip and knee with gypsum fixation

关键词

臀肌挛缩症/固定方式

Key words

Gluteal muscle contracture/Fixation

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

刘朝晖,瞿锡祥,向宏富..双侧臀肌挛缩术后两种不同固定方式比较[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2012,9(3):39-40,2.

生物骨科材料与临床研究

OACSTPCD

1672-5972

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文