四川医学2012，Vol.33Issue(7)：1259-1261,3.
两种手术方法治疗高血压脑出血的临床对比研究
The comparative study oftwo surgical procedures for hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage
冯家龙1
作者信息
- 1. 武警重庆市总队医院神经外科,重庆,400061
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
To investigate the clinical efficacy of small skull -window craniotomy (SWC) and minimally invasive evacuation intracranial hematoma (MIEIH) for hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage. Methods The clinical data of 114 patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage treated by surgery between Mar. 2007 and June. 2011 were analyzed. Among them, 59 cases treated by SWC, and 52 cases treated by MIEIH. Clinical parameters including operation duration, blood loss, the ADL classification after surgery and complications between groups were compared. Results The operation duration and blood loss in SWC group were the corresponding data of ( 1. 14 ±0.41) h and (61.18 ±0.23) ml, these in MIEIH group were the corresponding data of ( 1. 26 ±0. 38) h and (54. 26 ±0. 51) ml. There was no statistical significances between two group (P>0.05); The ADL classification after surgery and complications had no statistical significances between two group (P > 0. 05) . Conclusion There are almost same clinical efficacy in using SWC and MIEIH for hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage. The application should according to the patient's condition and experience of surgeon关键词
高血压脑出血/外科手术/临床疗效Key words
hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage/ surgery clinical effcacy分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
冯家龙..两种手术方法治疗高血压脑出血的临床对比研究[J].四川医学,2012,33(7):1259-1261,3.
