| 注册
首页|期刊导航|生物骨科材料与临床研究|手法复位与切开复位治疗老年桡骨远端不稳定骨折的比较研究

手法复位与切开复位治疗老年桡骨远端不稳定骨折的比较研究

李成功

生物骨科材料与临床研究2012,Vol.9Issue(2):42-43,46,3.
生物骨科材料与临床研究2012,Vol.9Issue(2):42-43,46,3.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5972.2012.02.012

手法复位与切开复位治疗老年桡骨远端不稳定骨折的比较研究

Comparative research of close reduction and open reduction treatment for Senile unstable distal radius fractures

李成功1

作者信息

  • 1. 重庆市铜梁县人民医院骨科,重庆铜梁402560
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical results of close reduction and open reduction treatment for senile unstable distal radius fractures. Methods Retrospective analysis of the clinical results of 65 senile patients with unstable distal radius fractures from January 2009 to June 2010 in our department were randomly divided into close reduction group ( n=32 > and open reduction group (n=33 ). The patients of close reduction group were treated with close reduction and external fixator, while the patients of open reduction group were treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Results Follow-up duration averaged 10 months (6 to 12 months ). According to the Jakim evaluation score: the good excellent rate and satisfaction of the patients in the close reduction group were 78.13% and 84.38%, while the open reduction group were 84.85% and 78.79%. There was no significant difference in curative effect and the satisfaction of the patients for the two groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusions Close reduction and open reduction can achieve acceptable curative effect for senile unstable distal radius fractures.

关键词

老年/桡骨远端骨折/手法复位/切开复位

Key words

Senile/ Dislal radius fracture/ Close reduction/ Open reduction

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

李成功..手法复位与切开复位治疗老年桡骨远端不稳定骨折的比较研究[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2012,9(2):42-43,46,3.

生物骨科材料与临床研究

OACSTPCD

1672-5972

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文