海洋预报2012，Vol.29Issue(3)：9-14,6.
两种海面风场的对比及对海浪模拟的影响
Comparison between two sea surface wind fields and their influence on the wave simulations
周凯 1陈希 1李妍 1毛科峰 1王楼 2陆正民3
作者信息
- 1. 解放军理工大学气象学院,江苏南京211101
- 2. 北海舰队水文气象中心,山东青岛266000
- 3. 解放军91528部队,上海200436
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Reanalysis wind data can provide a large scale and high spatial-temporal resolution sea surface wind field, and plays a pivotal role in the wave simulation and forecast. Based on the wind field data from QuickSCAT/ NCEP(Q/N) and ERA validated by the data from Japanese buoy station and and satellites altimeter data, the waves are simulated for 12 months by the WAVEWATCH-Ⅲ model. The results show as follows: wind data from ERA and Q/N are stronger than the actual wind when wind speed is low, but weaker when wind speed is high; the wave height simulated by ERA wind is smaller than that from buoy data; the wave height simulated by Q/N wind is more close to the actual wind.关键词
QuickSCAT/NCEP混合风场/ERA风场/WAVEWATCH-ⅢKey words
QuickSCAT/NCEP mixed wind/ ERA wind/ WAVEWATCH-Ⅲ分类
海洋科学引用本文复制引用
周凯,陈希,李妍,毛科峰,王楼,陆正民..两种海面风场的对比及对海浪模拟的影响[J].海洋预报,2012,29(3):9-14,6.
