| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国药房|西酞普兰与阿米替林治疗卒中后抑郁障碍的Meta分析

西酞普兰与阿米替林治疗卒中后抑郁障碍的Meta分析

陈亮 谢亮 卢葭 周新雨 郭菁 房亮 谢鹏

中国药房2012,Vol.23Issue(24):2221-2225,5.
中国药房2012,Vol.23Issue(24):2221-2225,5.DOI:10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2012.24.06

西酞普兰与阿米替林治疗卒中后抑郁障碍的Meta分析

Meta-analysis of Citalopram and Amitriptyline for Post-stroke Depression

陈亮 1谢亮 2卢葭 1周新雨 2郭菁 1房亮 2谢鹏1

作者信息

  • 1. 重庆医科大学附属第一医院神经内科,重庆400016
  • 2. 重庆医科大学神经科学研究中心,重庆400016
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of citalopram and amitriptyline for post-stroke depression (PSD). METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) focused on citalopram vs. Amitriptyline in the treatment of PSD were searched from the databases including: Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, CBM, VIP, CNKI and Wanfang database. The qualities of included RCTs were evaluated by means of RevMan 5.1 to conduct the Meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 18 RCTs were included, involving 1 040 PSD patients. Meta-analysis results disclosed that the effectiveness of citalopram group was better than that of amitriptyline group after 6 weeks treatment [RR=1.10, 95%CI (1.02,1.18), P=0.01]; the effectiveness of the 2 groups had no significant differences after 8 weeks treatment [RR=1.05, 95%CI(0.97,1.14) ,P=0.09]; compared with amitriptyline group, citalopram group not only presented advantages that improvement of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score after 1, 2, 4, 6 weeks treatment, but also existed advantages that improvement of side effects scale score 2, 4, 6, 8 weeks after treatment. CONCLUSION: The effect of citalopram is equivalent to amitriptyline, whereas it's faster and safer than amitriptyline in the treatment of PSD.

关键词

西酞普兰/阿米替林/卒中后抑郁障碍/有效性/安全性/Meta分析

Key words

Citalopram/ Amitriptyline/ Post-stroke depression/ Efficacy/ Safety/ Meta-analysis

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

陈亮,谢亮,卢葭,周新雨,郭菁,房亮,谢鹏..西酞普兰与阿米替林治疗卒中后抑郁障碍的Meta分析[J].中国药房,2012,23(24):2221-2225,5.

基金项目

科技部重大科学研究计划资助项目(2009CB918300) (2009CB918300)

中国药房

OACSCDCSTPCD

1001-0408

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文