大气科学2012，Vol.36Issue(4)：657-672,16.DOI:10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2012.11057
地基热红外云高观测与云雷达及激光云高仪的相互对比
Comparison of Cloud Base Heights by Ground Based Sky IR Brightness Temperature Measurements with Cloud Radar and Ceilometer in Shouxian
摘要
Abstract
The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Mobile Facility (AMF) was deployed in Shouxian,Anhui Province,China from May to December 2008.ARM W-band (95 GHz) Cloud Radar (WACR) and Vaisala Ceilometer (VCEIL) are ground-based instruments used to probe the vertical structure of clouds.The temporal resolution of reflectivity profile from WACR is 2 s.VCEIL can give cloud base height and backscatter profile,with the temporal resolution of 15 s.Both of them make zenith-pointing measurements.During the AMF campaign,the measurements of the whole sky thermal infrared brightness temperature were conducted from November 27 to December 30,2008 at the same place,using an automatic scanning infrared thermometer (SIRIS-1) developed by the Key Laboratory of Middle Atmosphere and Global Environment Observation (LAGEO),Institute of Atmospheric Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,the temporal resolution is 15 minutes.The three instruments made paratactic measurements for total 16 days,and the comparisons are made between the results.The SIRIS-1 effective cloud base height was calculated by using the data of sky brightness temperature and the surface weather data observed at the same time.The VCEIL cloud base heights were averaged over a 3-minute interval centered at the time of each SIRIS-1 zenith-pointing measurement,and the WACR macro cloud properties were retrieved from the average reflectivity profile of 15 measurements around that time.A total of 1661 measurements were synchronously made by the three instruments,which including 428,287,225 times of cloud measurements by WACR,SIRIS-1,and VCEIL,respectively.Three sets of cloud base height data were analyzed: all of the data,single-layered and two- or three-layered cloud data.For all the data,the correlation coefficient between WACR and SIRIS-1 (287 samples) is 0.82,and that between WACR and VCEIL (225 samples) is 0.6.For single-layered,on the basis of a total of 75 samples,the standard deviations of the differences between WACR and SIRIS-1,and between WACR and VCEIL are 0,88 km and L61 km,while the corresponding correlation coefficients are 0.85 and 0.53,respectively.For two- or three-layered,the SIRIS-1 cloud base heights are,on average,within the WCAR top and bottom cloud boundaries,the result from VCEIL is in better agreement with WACR than in the other two cases because the bottom cloud base height in this case is relatively low.The comparison reveals that the cloud base heights by SIRIS-1 demonstrate the clear superiority of stability,reliability,and economy,though there is a systematic bias relative to the results from WACR.A preliminary method for improving cloud base height from SIRIS-1 is suggested.关键词
扫描式红外成像仪/云雷达/云高仪/云底高Key words
all sky IR scanning imager, cloud radar, ceilometer, cloud base height分类
天文与地球科学引用本文复制引用
章文星,吕达仁..地基热红外云高观测与云雷达及激光云高仪的相互对比[J].大气科学,2012,36(4):657-672,16.基金项目
国家自然科学基金资助项目40775026,公益性行业(气象)科研专项GYHY200806031 （气象）
