临床口腔医学杂志2012，Vol.28Issue(7)：414-416,3.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-1634.2012.07.010
两种正畸粘接剂在埋伏牙矫治中的临床效果分析
Comparative analysis on clinical effects of two kinds of orthodontic adhesives for impacted teeth
何爱娥 1冮卫东 1韩晶 1熊贵忠1
作者信息
- 1. 武汉市五医院口腔科 湖北武汉430050
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective: To compare the orthodontic attachmentst failure rate of two kinds of orthodontic adhesives for impacted teelh. Method: 48 orthodontic patients were divided into 2 groups randomly. Following closed-eruption surgery.orthodontic traction was carried out after 1 week and used different adhesives (One group were bonded with GC Fuji ortho bonding adhesive.The other group with Jingjin enamel adhesive).Compared the failure rates after 2 months,6 months and 12 months. Result: We found there was statistical difference between the CC Fuji ortho bonding adhesive group and the Jingjin enamel adhesive group in 2 month (P <0.05). In 6 and 12 month, the bonding failure rate in the two groups was not significantly different (P >0.05). Conclusion: the banding failure rate in GC Fuji ortho bonding adhesive group was lower than that in Jingjin enamel adhesive group in 2 month, The long term adhesive effects of two kinds of adhesives are alike.关键词
GC Fuji正畸粘接剂/京津釉质粘接剂/埋伏牙/闭合牵引助萌术Key words
GC Fuji ortho bonding adhesive/ Jingjin enamel adhesive/ impacted teeth/closed-eruption surgical technique分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
何爱娥,冮卫东,韩晶,熊贵忠..两种正畸粘接剂在埋伏牙矫治中的临床效果分析[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2012,28(7):414-416,3.
