中国骨伤2012，Vol.25Issue(5)：393-396,4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2012.05.010
应用Cable-Pin内固定系统治疗尺骨鹰嘴骨折的病例对照研究
Case-control study on Cable-Pin system in the treatment of olecranon fractures
马胡晶 1单磊 2周君琳 2刘清和 3陆铁 3孙松3
作者信息
- 1. 北京市昌平区中医医院骨科,北京102200
- 2. 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院骨科,北京 100020
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective: To prospectively evaluate the clinical result of Cable-Pin system in the treatment of olecranon fractures and compare with tension band wiring (TBW) method. Methods:From March 2008 to June 2010,65 patients with olecranon fractures were divided into two groups:32 patients in Cable-Pin group were treated with Cable-Pin system,including 18 males and 14 females, ranging in age from 21 to 69 years, with an average of (53.69?13.42) years; 33 patients in TBW group were treated with Kirschner tension bend. including 20 males and 13 females, ranging in age from 20 to 70 years, with an average of (53.18?3.36) years. The incision length,operation time,the amounts of hemoglobin after operation,fracture healing time .complications and HSS elbow scores were recorded and analyzed statistically. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 24 months,with an average period of 18.4 months. Results:There were statistical differences (P<0.05 Jin fracture healing time(i= 2.588,P=0.012) .complication rate(x2=4.534,P=0.033) and HSS elbow joint scores(Z=-2.039,P=0.041 Jbetween two groups, which all were superior to TBW in Cable-Pin group. There was no statistical differences (P>0.05) in the length of incision (t= 0.416,P=0..679) .operation time (t=0.8l6,P=0.417)and the postoperative amounts of hemoglobin U=-0.553,P=0.294) between two groups. Conclusion;Cable-Pin system is an easy and reliable method for the treatment of olecranon fractures with less complications and better functions than TBW.关键词
尺骨骨折/骨折固定术,内/肘关节/病例对照研究Key words
Ulna fractures/Fracture fixation, internal/Elbow joint/Case-control studies引用本文复制引用
马胡晶,单磊,周君琳,刘清和,陆铁,孙松..应用Cable-Pin内固定系统治疗尺骨鹰嘴骨折的病例对照研究[J].中国骨伤,2012,25(5):393-396,4.
