| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国美容医学|安氏Ⅱ类错(牙合)4种治疗方法比较

安氏Ⅱ类错(牙合)4种治疗方法比较

郭丹 宋杨 刘鑫

中国美容医学2012,Vol.21Issue(11):1606-1608,3.
中国美容医学2012,Vol.21Issue(11):1606-1608,3.

安氏Ⅱ类错(牙合)4种治疗方法比较

Compare of four methods in treatment about Angle Ⅱ Malocclusion

郭丹 1宋杨 2刘鑫2

作者信息

  • 1. 商洛市商州区人民医院口腔科 陕西商洛726000
  • 2. 第四军医大学口腔医学院正畸科
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To understand the use ratio and change with time by the statistics of four method in treatment about Angle II Malocclusion. Methods The first, 9759 completed cases were investiged between 2007 and 2011,and 2864 cases were creened before treatment for class II molar relationship.Then,the number and percentage of class II malocclusion patients were counted, and the patients were treated severally by distalization of upper molar.mandibular advancements extracting four premolars and extracting two maxillary teeth. Results The mandibular advancement is The largest proportion,and is 32% .During 5 years,the patients were In decline by Non extraction orthodontic treatment,and the patients inceased by the orther methods of orthodontic treatment. Conclusion The mandibular advancement is the most frequently used method between treatment about Angle II Malocclusion. the patients were In decline by Non extraction orthodontic treatment.and the patients inceased by adult "MTM" treatment and operation treatment.

关键词

安氏Ⅱ类错(牙合)/治疗方法/比较

Key words

Angle II Malocclusion/method of treatment/compare

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

郭丹,宋杨,刘鑫..安氏Ⅱ类错(牙合)4种治疗方法比较[J].中国美容医学,2012,21(11):1606-1608,3.

中国美容医学

1008-6455

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文