| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中华医学杂志(英文版)|Quality assessment of clinical guidelines in China: 1993-2010

Quality assessment of clinical guidelines in China: 1993-2010

CHEN Yao-long XIE Chang-chun YANG Ke-hu YAO Liang XIAO Xiao-juan WANG Qi WANG Ze-hao LIANG Fu-xiang LIANG Hui WANG Xin SHEN Xi-ping

中华医学杂志(英文版)2012,Vol.125Issue(20):3660-3664,5.
中华医学杂志(英文版)2012,Vol.125Issue(20):3660-3664,5.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2012.20.011

Quality assessment of clinical guidelines in China: 1993-2010

Quality assessment of clinical guidelines in China: 1993-2010

CHEN Yao-long 1XIE Chang-chun 2YANG Ke-hu 1YAO Liang 3XIAO Xiao-juan 3WANG Qi 4WANG Ze-hao 3LIANG Fu-xiang 3LIANG Hui 3WANG Xin 3SHEN Xi-ping1

作者信息

  • 1. Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
  • 2. Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati,Ohio, USA
  • 3. The First Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou,Gansu 730000, China
  • 4. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou,Gansu 730000, China
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Background Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) play an important role in healthcare in China as well as in the world.However,the current status and trends of Chinese CPGs are unknown.The aim of this study was to systematically review the present situation and the quality of Chinese CPGs published in the peer-reviewed medical literature.Methods To identify Chinese CPGs,a systematic search of relevant literature databases (CBM,WANFANG,VIP,and CNKI) was performed for the period January 1978 to December 2010.We used the AGREE Ⅱ instrument to assess the quality of the included guidelines.Results We evaluated 269 guidelines published in 115 medical journals from 1993 to 2010 and produced by 256different developers.Only four guidelines (1%) described the systematic methods for searching and selecting the evidence,14 (5%) guidelines indicated an explicit link between the supporting evidence and the recommendations,only one guideline used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment,Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.Thirty-one guidelines (12%) mentioned updates and the average frequency of update was 5.5 years; none described a procedure for updating the guideline.From the assessment with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Ecaluation Ⅱ (AGREE Ⅱ),the mean scores were low for the domains "scope and purpose" (19%) and "clarity of presentation" (26%)and very low for the other domains ("rigour of development" 7%,"stakeholder involvement" 8%,"applicability" 6% and "editorial independence" 2%).Conclusions Compared with other studies on the quality of guidelines assessed with the AGREE instrument in other countries,Chinese CPGs received lower scores,which indicates a relatively poor quality of the guidelines.However,there was some increase over time.

关键词

clinical practice guidelines/evidence based medicine/quality assessment

Key words

clinical practice guidelines/evidence based medicine/quality assessment

引用本文复制引用

CHEN Yao-long,XIE Chang-chun,YANG Ke-hu,YAO Liang,XIAO Xiao-juan,WANG Qi,WANG Ze-hao,LIANG Fu-xiang,LIANG Hui,WANG Xin,SHEN Xi-ping..Quality assessment of clinical guidelines in China: 1993-2010[J].中华医学杂志(英文版),2012,125(20):3660-3664,5.

基金项目

This study was supported by a grant from the Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges,Lanzhou University (No.lzujbky-2009-t12). (No.lzujbky-2009-t12)

中华医学杂志(英文版)

OACSCDCSTPCDMEDLINESCI

0366-6999

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文