草业学报2012，Vol.21Issue(6)：242-251,10.
不同混播方式豆禾混播草地生产性能的综合评价
A comprehensive evaluation of the productive performance of legume-grass mixtures under different mixed sowing patterns
摘要
Abstract
The productive performance of legume-grass mixtures was analyzed with the grey correlative system in seven combinations of 6 species mixtures (Onobrychis viciaefolia , Medicago sativa , Trifolium pratense , Dactylis glomerata , Bromus inermis , and Phleum pratense) , 5-1 species mixture (M. sativa, T. pratense, D. glomerata, B. inermis, and P. pratense), 5-2 species mixture (M. sativa, O. viciaefolia, D. glomerata, B. inermis, and P. pratense), 4-1 species mixture (M. sativa, T. pratense, D. glomerata, and B. inermis), 4-2 species mixture (M. sativa, 0. viciaefolia, D. glomerata, and B. inermis), 3-1 species mixture (M. sativa, D. glomerata, and B. inermis), 3-2 species mixture (O. viciaefolia, D. glomerata, and B. inermis). Three sowing ratios were used to establish evaluation models of productive performance including forage yield, forage quality, interspecific compatibility and community stability. The productive performance of the 6 species mixture performed better than the other mixed sowing species combinations, whereas the productive performance was not significantly different between three sowing ratios. The combinations were divided into three groups based on performance: ecological stability, forage yield and forage quality. The 6 species mixture belonged to the ecological stability type and was characterized by its better performance in interspecific compatibility, community stability and forage yield. This type was recommended for sustainable use. The forage yield type included 5-2 species, 4-2 species, and 3-2 species mixtures, and was characterized by their better performance in forage yield but poorer performance in forage quality. This type could be utilized to provide large quantity roughage. The forage quality type included 5-1 species, 4-1 species, and 3-1 species mixtures, and was characterized by their better performance in forage quality but poorer performance in forage yield. This type could be utilized to provide high quality forage.关键词
豆禾混播草地/混播种类/混播比例/生产性能/灰色关联度分析Key words
Leguminosae ?Gramineae mixture/ mixed sowing species/ mixed sowing ratios/ productive performance/ grey correlative degree analysis分类
农业科技引用本文复制引用
郑伟,朱进忠,加娜尔古丽..不同混播方式豆禾混播草地生产性能的综合评价[J].草业学报,2012,21(6):242-251,10.基金项目
农业部公益性行业科研专项(201003023)和新疆维吾尔自治区科技支疆项目计划(引导性)项目(201191224)资助. （201003023）
