摘要
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Qizheng xiaotong plaster and Shangshi zhitong plaster for musculoskeletal pain and swelling. METHODS: Retrieved from CBM, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang database and reviewed reference literatures , RCTs and non-RCTS of Qizheng xiaotong plaster vs. Shangshi zhitong plaster were included. The methodology qualities of included literatures were evaluated by Cochrane Handbook, and Meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.1.0 software. RESULTS : 8 included studies were included. Meta-analysis showed that Qizheng xiaotong plaster was significantly more effective than Shangshi zhitong plaster effectual rate: [RR=3.06, 95%CI(2.16, 4.33) ,P<0.000 01]; total effective rate: [RR=1.43, 95%CI (1.18,1.74), P=0.000 4]. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of anaphylactic reaction [RR=0.62, 95% CI(0.34,1.14) , P=0.12]. CONCLUSION: Qizheng xiaotong plaster is more effective than Shangshi zhitong plaster in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain and swelling in short-term, but they have similar incidence of anaphylactic reaction.关键词
奇正消痛贴膏/伤湿止痛膏/系统评价/肿胀/疼痛Key words
Qizheng xiaotong plaster/ Shangshi Zhitong plaster/ Systematic evaluation/ Swelling/ Pain分类
医药卫生
