南方农业学报2013，Vol.44Issue(1)：96-100,5.DOI:10.3969/j:issn.2095-1191.2013.1.96
不同施肥处理对毛葡萄野酿2号产量及品质的影响
Influences of different fertilizer treatments on the yield and quality of wild grape variety Yeniang 2 (Vitis quinquangularis Rehd.)
摘要
Abstract
[Objective]This research studied the beneficiary effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizer applications on the yield and quality of wild grape (Vitis quinquangularis Rehd.)and screened for the best fertilizer combination to provide technical support for fertilizer application decisions in wild grape production. [Method] Using "3414" complete implementation scheme (the N, P2O5, and K2O application on 2 levels were respectively 100.20, 114.30, and 108.90 kg/ha), the yield and quality of wild grape variety Yeniang 2 were determined and the economic benefits of fertilizer application were analyzed. [Result]Under the conditions of available N(196 mg/kg)and available K(414 mg/kg)in soil moisture, the combined effects of different fertilization treatments on grape yield promotion were arranged in the following order:N2P2K0(28122.62 kg/ha)>N0P2K2(27819.57 kg/ha)>N1P1K2(25940.69 kg/ha) >N2P0K2 (24849.73 kg/ha). The effect of P fertilizer on the fruit yield was not significant. The N, K fertilizers interacted on the wild grapes; the yield resulting from N0P2K2 application was significantly higher than the yield resulting from N3P2K2 application (21970.80 kg/ha). As the potassium content increased, the resulting fruit yield decreased. Effects of different fertilizer treatments on the soluble solid contents of wild grapes were not significant. [Conclusion]During different wild grape growth periods, the ratios of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers should be reasonably combined with the corresponding type of soil and effective component contents for fruit application.关键词
毛葡萄/野酿2号/产量/品质/"3414"完全实施方案Key words
Vitis quinquangularis Rehd./ Yeniang 2/ yield/ quality/ "3414"complete implementation scheme分类
农业科技引用本文复制引用
吴代东,覃柳燕,邹瑜,牟海飞,张进忠,韦绍龙,李小泉,林贵美..不同施肥处理对毛葡萄野酿2号产量及品质的影响[J].南方农业学报,2013,44(1):96-100,5.基金项目
广西科学研究与技术开发计划项目(桂科攻0992011-5) （桂科攻0992011-5）
生态广西建设项目(桂财建[2011]314号):广西农业科学院成果转化专项项目(农成转201204-A) （桂财建[2011]314号）
