中国人口·资源与环境2012，Vol.22Issue(12)：89-93,5.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2012.12.015
上海两类农村居民点整治模式的比较
A Comparative Study for Two Village Land Readjustment Patterns on the Suburb of Shanghai
摘要
Abstract
As two important village land readjustment patterns of Shanghai suburbs, house land displacement and village merging have achieved remarkable results in improving farmers' living environment, increasing cultivated land areas, promoting intensive use of land and so on. Results show that house land displacement is carried out under the auspices of the government and is kind of new town development which is mainly driven by foreign aid. Social security and employment policy is also needed when famers become citizens in this process. This pattern is prevalent in rapid urbanization regions with more developed economics and higher level of industrialization. The core of house land displacement is to advance urbanization and the point is to coordinate village land with planned urban construction land, design high floor area ratio multi - storey buildings in resettlement areas and construct municipal services facilities in order to solve the space matching problem of farmers' employment and living. Village merging is carried out under the auspices of village collective organizations and is supported by the government. It is kind of village self-renewal which is mainly affected by the kernel driver. Fiscal and taxation policies are quite important in this pattern. This pattern is prevalent in agricultural regions with less developed economics and lower level of industrialization. The core of village merging is to expand farmers' land operation scale and promote centralized development of villages and industries. The point is to reconstruct village space so as to reduce infrastructure operating costs and improve public service efficiencies as well as fanners' living conditions.关键词
农村居民点整治/宅基地置换/村庄归并/模式Key words
village land readjustment/ house land displacement/ village merging/ pattern分类
管理科学引用本文复制引用
张正峰,杨红,吴沅箐,郭碧云..上海两类农村居民点整治模式的比较[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(12):89-93,5.基金项目
国家"985工程优势学科创新平台项目"专项经费资助. （）
