| 注册
首页|期刊导航|局解手术学杂志|人工股骨头置换与空心螺钉治疗老年股骨颈骨折的临床比较

人工股骨头置换与空心螺钉治疗老年股骨颈骨折的临床比较

吴锁印

局解手术学杂志2013,Vol.22Issue(1):34-35,2.
局解手术学杂志2013,Vol.22Issue(1):34-35,2.DOI:10.11659/jjssx.1672-5042.2013010015

人工股骨头置换与空心螺钉治疗老年股骨颈骨折的临床比较

Comparative study of artificial femoral head replacement and cannulated screws for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients

吴锁印1

作者信息

  • 1. 郎溪县中医院骨伤科,安徽宣城242100
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effect of internal fixation (AO compress cannulated screws) and artificial femoral head replacement. Methods The elderly patients with femoral neck fractures treated in our department were selected, and they were divided into two groups according to the different ways of treatment. 32 patients in the observation group were underwent artificial femoral head replacement while 35 patients in the control group received internal fixation. And the comparison of some related datas was made between the two groups after the operation. Results The operative duration, intra-operative blood loss and cost of hospitalization in the observation group was higher than those of the control group(P <0. 05) , but the control group has longer immobilization time and higher complication rate of infection. The one-year follow-up shows that the observation group has better Harris scores and life quality ( P < 0. 05 ). Conclusion Artificial femoral head replacement is a good choice for displaced femoral neck fracture patients over 65 years in order to gain better life quality with a view to age, type of fracture, physical and living condition.

关键词

人工股骨头置换术/空心螺钉/老年/股骨颈骨折

Key words

artificial femoral head replacement/canulated screw/elderly patients/femoral neck fractures

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

吴锁印..人工股骨头置换与空心螺钉治疗老年股骨颈骨折的临床比较[J].局解手术学杂志,2013,22(1):34-35,2.

局解手术学杂志

OACSTPCD

1672-5042

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文