中国康复2013，Vol.28Issue(2)：99-102,4.DOI:10.3870/zgkf.2013.02.006
肌电生物反馈疗法与神经肌肉电刺激治疗脑卒中后吞咽障碍的疗效比较
Curative effect comparison of electromyographic biofeedback therapy vs.neuromuscular electrical stimulation therapy for stroke patients with dysphagia
摘要
Abstract
Objective: To compare the curative effect between electromyographic biofeedback therapy vs. neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) therapy for stroke patients with dysphagia. Methods: All 90 stroke patients with dysphagia were randomly divided into deglutition training group (control group) ,NMES therapy group (NMES group) and electromyographic biofeedback therapy group (biofeedback group). Before and after treatment, Kubota Toshio's drinking tests were performed on 3 groups of patients to evaluate swallowing function and clinical effects. Results: After two courses of treatments,Kubota Toshio's drinking tests to three groups were improved as compared with pretreatment (P<0. 05,0. 01), those in the feedback group were improved most significantly (all P<0. 05), and those in the NMES group were improved more significantly than in the control group (P<0. 05). The total effective rate in feedback group was higher than in NMES group and control group (all P<0. 05) ,and that in NMES group was higher than in control group (P<0. 05). Conclusion:Electromyographic biofeedback therapy was more effective than NMES therapy on stroke patients with dysphagia.关键词
生物反馈/神经肌肉电刺激/脑卒中/吞咽障碍Key words
biofeedback/neuromuscular electrical stimulation/stroke/dysphagia分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
谢镇良,聂金莺,邓土保,黄湛滨..肌电生物反馈疗法与神经肌肉电刺激治疗脑卒中后吞咽障碍的疗效比较[J].中国康复,2013,28(2):99-102,4.
