现代检验医学杂志2013，Vol.28Issue(3)：112-113,116,3.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2013.03.035
不同检查方法对孕妇尿检测结果的比较分析
Comparative Analysis of Urine Testing by Different Methods in Pregnant Women
李芒会 1张利侠 1胡淑玲 1弥鹏 1王莉 1张连1
作者信息
- 1. 陕西省人民医院检验科,西安,710068
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To examine the reliability of urine testing by urinary sediment analyzer (UF-1000i) in pregnant women. Methods One hundred middle-urine samples were randomly collected from pregnant women and non-pregnant patients. Comparing the results of urine testing which were examined by three different methods, urinary sediment analyzer (UF-1000i),dry chemistry analyzer and microscopy,and finding the reasons that lead to? false positive results in urinary sediment analyzer (UF-1000i). Results The positive predictive values (PPV) of white blood cells (WBC),red blood cells (RBC), tube, epithelial cells and the crystal in urine testing from pregnant women by urinary sediment analyzer were 67. 8%,61. 9%, 16. 7%, 91.0% and 57. 1% , respectively, and from non-pregnant patients were 89. 3% , 83. 3% , 65. 5% , 93. 6% and 87. 1%. The PPV of WBC and RBC in urine testing from pregnant women by dry chemistry analyzer were 88. 9% and 81. 1% , respectively, and from non-pregnant patients were 96. 1% and 81. 6% , respectively. Conclusions The PPV in pregnant women were lower than in non-pregnant patients by urinary sediment analyzer (UF-1000i) and dry chemistry analyzer. Therefore,microscopic examination must be carried out and the false positive results should be modified when there are differences between urinary sediment analyzer (UF-1000i) and dry chemistry analyzer in urine testing from pregnant women.关键词
尿沉渣分析仪/孕妇/尿沉渣Key words
urinary sediment analyzer/ pregnant women/ urinary sediment分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
李芒会,张利侠,胡淑玲,弥鹏,王莉,张连..不同检查方法对孕妇尿检测结果的比较分析[J].现代检验医学杂志,2013,28(3):112-113,116,3.
