临床骨科杂志2013，Vol.16Issue(4)：422-424,3.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0287.2013.04.028
锁定钢板与传统钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折疗效比较
Comparison of locking plate of proximal humerus and traditional plates in treatment of proximal humerus fractures in aged osteoporotic population
刘成 1寿康全 1彭涛 1李坚 1付纳新 1刘鹏宇1
作者信息
- 1. 三峡大学第三临床医学院、葛洲坝中心医院骨科,湖北宜昌443002
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical results of locking plate of proximal humerus (LPPH)and traditional plate in treatment of proximal humerus fractures in aged osteoporotic population.Methods 89 old osteoporotic patients with humerus fractures were treated with LPPH (46 cases) and traditional steel plates (43 cases) respectively.The operation time,hospitalization complications and blood loss were recorded.The results were compared retrospectively in 6 weeks,3 months and 1 year.Results Follow-ups were conducted in six weeks,12 weeks and one year postoperatively to assess shoulder scores by ASES and Constant-Murley systems.Comparison showed that the results for LPPH group were statistically better than those for traditional steel plate group in rate of implant loosening and ASES scores(P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions LPPH has an obvious advantage over traditional plate in treatment of proximal humerus fractures in aged osteoporotic people.关键词
肱骨近端骨折/肱骨近端锁定钢板/骨质疏松Key words
proximal humerus fracture /locking plate of proximal humerus / osteoporosis分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
刘成,寿康全,彭涛,李坚,付纳新,刘鹏宇..锁定钢板与传统钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折疗效比较[J].临床骨科杂志,2013,16(4):422-424,3.
