| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国临床医学|玻璃离子和流体树脂修复楔状缺损的疗效比较

玻璃离子和流体树脂修复楔状缺损的疗效比较

陆佳萍 赵守亮 徐培成

中国临床医学2013,Vol.20Issue(3):372-374,3.
中国临床医学2013,Vol.20Issue(3):372-374,3.

玻璃离子和流体树脂修复楔状缺损的疗效比较

Comparation of the Clinical Effects of Glass Ionomer Cement and Flowable Composite Resin on the Restoration of Dental Wedge-Shaped Defects

陆佳萍 1赵守亮 2徐培成2

作者信息

  • 1. 上海市徐汇区牙病防治所,上海200032
  • 2. 同济大学口腔医学院口腔内科,上海 200072
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective:To compare the clinical effects of glass ionomer cement(GIC) and flowable composite resin(FCR) on the restoration of dental wedge-shaped defects as liners.Methods:A total of 376 teeth from 105 patients with wedge-shaped defects were studied and divided into Group A and Group B randomly with self-contrasted method.The depth of wedge-shaped defects was more than 1 mm and less than 2 mm,and the patients were with dentin hypersensitiveness and without pulpitis.Group A was restored with composite resin after applying flowable composite as a liner in one side,and Group B was filled with composite resin after lined with GIC.The Ryge criteria and United States Public Health Service(USPHS) criteria were used to evaluate postoperative sensitivity and cumulative loss rates of the treatment effects after 1 week,1 month,1 year and 3 years.Results:Postoperative sensitivity after 1 week and 1 month in Group A were 18.3 % (28/153) and 9.2 % (14/153),respectively; and they were 35.9 %(55/153) and 28.1%(43/153) in Group B,respectively.There was significant difference between the two groups(P all<0.01).There was no significant difference between two groups after 1 year and 3 years.Postoperative cumulative loss rates after 1 year and 3 years in Group A were 9.8 % (15/153),and 11.8 % (18/153),respectively; they were 2.6 %(4/153) and 3.3 % (5/153) in Group B,respectively.There was significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05 and 0.01).But there was no significant difference between the two groups after 1 week and 1 month.Conclusions:Both GIC and FCR are ideal materials for restoration of dental wedge-shaped defects as liners,but GIC has its advantages in anti-postoperative sensitivity,while the FCR has good retention.

关键词

楔状缺损/玻璃离子/流体树脂/夹层技术

Key words

Wedge-shaped defect/Glass ionomer cement/Flowable composite resin/Sandwich technique

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

陆佳萍,赵守亮,徐培成..玻璃离子和流体树脂修复楔状缺损的疗效比较[J].中国临床医学,2013,20(3):372-374,3.

中国临床医学

OACSTPCD

1008-6358

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文