首页|期刊导航|中华医学杂志(英文版)|Randomized comparison of intracoronary tirofiban versus urokinase as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results of the ICTUS-AMI trial
Randomized comparison of intracoronary tirofiban versus urokinase as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results of the ICTUS-AMI trial
ZHU Tian-qi ZHANG Qi DING Feng-hua QIU Jian-ping JIN Hui-geng JIANG Li LU Lin
中华医学杂志(英文版)2013,Vol.126Issue(16):3079-3086,8.
中华医学杂志(英文版)2013,Vol.126Issue(16):3079-3086,8.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20130466
Randomized comparison of intracoronary tirofiban versus urokinase as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results of the ICTUS-AMI trial
Randomized comparison of intracoronary tirofiban versus urokinase as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results of the ICTUS-AMI trial
摘要
关键词
acute myocardial infarction/ electrocardiography/ primary percutaneous coronary intervention/ tirofiban/urokinaseKey words
acute myocardial infarction/ electrocardiography/ primary percutaneous coronary intervention/ tirofiban/urokinase引用本文复制引用
ZHU Tian-qi,ZHANG Qi,DING Feng-hua,QIU Jian-ping,JIN Hui-geng,JIANG Li,LU Lin..Randomized comparison of intracoronary tirofiban versus urokinase as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results of the ICTUS-AMI trial[J].中华医学杂志(英文版),2013,126(16):3079-3086,8.基金项目
The study was supported by grants from the Shanghai Science and Technology Foundation (No.05DZ19503) and the National Natural Science Fotmdation of China (No.30900589) (No.05DZ19503)