实用临床医药杂志2013，Vol.17Issue(16)：42-44,3.DOI:10.7619/jcmp.201316015
选择性断流术和联合断流术治疗门静脉高压症的疗效对比
Comparison of efficacy between selective devascularization and combined devascularization in the treatment of portal hypertension
张卫群 1雒军强1
作者信息
- 1. 陕西宝鸡市中医医院肝胆外科,陕西宝鸡,721001
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of selective devascularization and combined devascularization in the treatment of portal hypertension.Methods One hundred and five patients with portal hypertension who were treated in our hospital from March 2001 to March 2012were divided into group A and group B based on surgical procedures.Group A (n =53) underwent selective devascularization and Group B (n =52) underwent combined devascularization.The postoperative free portal pressure and the incidence of postoperative bleeding and other complications after surgery were compared.Results Postoperative free portal pressure (FPP) in the two groups significantly decreased (P ＜ 0.05),but FPP of group A decreased more markedly than that of group B (P＜0.05).The incidence of lower esophageal varicose vein diameter,bleeding and other complications of group A were significantly lower than those of group B (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Compared with combined devascularization,selective devascularization had good effect and fewer complications in the treatment of portal hypertension,and is a better surgical method.关键词
门静脉高压症/选择性断流术/联合断流术/疗效对比Key words
portal vein hypertension/ selective devascularization/ joint devascularization/efficacy comparison分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
张卫群,雒军强..选择性断流术和联合断流术治疗门静脉高压症的疗效对比[J].实用临床医药杂志,2013,17(16):42-44,3.
