中国医药科学Issue(16)：187-188,2.
左室急性心肌梗死急诊介入治疗与择期介入的对比分析
Comparative analysis of emergency intervention and elective intervention in the treatment of left ventricular acute myocardial infarction
刘倩 1梁传亮 1唐志远1
作者信息
- 1. 湖南省石门县人民医院心血管内科,湖南石门415300
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To explore the effect of emergency intervention and elective intervention in the treatment of left ventricular acute myocardial infarction. Methods Selected 76 cases with initial left ventricular acute myocardial infarction from our hospital were divided randomly into emergency group which was within 24 hours, delayed group 1 of 24 hours to 2 weeks and delayed group 2 which was more than 2 weeks. Respectively measured cardiac function and determined end-diastolic diameter before surgery and after 3 months and 6 months. Results The cardiac function of emergency group and delayed group 1 were significant improved after surgery 3 months and 6 months, and there was significant difference(P<0.05). The end-diastolic diameters of emergency group and delayed group 1 were smaller than delayed group 2 before surgery and after 3 months and 6 months, and there was significant difference(P <0.05). Conclusion Emergency intervention and elective intervention of 24 hours to 2 weeks both can improve ventricular remodeling and heart function.关键词
左室急性心肌梗死/急诊/择期介入/对比Key words
Left ventricular acute myocardial infarction/Emergency/Elective intervention/Comparing分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
刘倩,梁传亮,唐志远..左室急性心肌梗死急诊介入治疗与择期介入的对比分析[J].中国医药科学,2012,(16):187-188,2.
