国际眼科杂志Issue(12)：2370-2372,3.DOI:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2013.12.02
阈下微脉冲激光与氩离子激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的临床随机对照研究
Randomized, controlled clinical trial comparison of SDM laser versus argon ion laser in diabetic macular edema
摘要
Abstract
AIM: To compare the efficacy of subthreshold micropulse diode ( SDM) laser treatment and argon ion la ser treatment for diabetic macular edema ( DME) . <br> METHODS: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was carried out in 84 patients (99 eyes), in which, 49 eyes received argon ion laser treatment and 50e yes received SDM laser treatm ent. The changes in best corrected visual acuity ( BCVA ) , baseline fluorescein angiography and optic coherence tomography measurements were evaluated in both groups.Follow-up visit was over 6 months from baseline. <br> RESULTS:Ninety-nine eyes (84 patients ) complete the study.Six months after treatment, the BCVA improved 22.4%a nd 02 .0%eyesi n argon io n laser group and SDM laser group respectivel y.55.1% and 5 8.0% eyesr eceived ste ady BCVA.Edem a par tial regression was accounted for 49% in argon ion laser group, while th at was 56% in SDM laser group. No statistically signi fica nt changes were found in ea chgr oup. <br> CONCLUSION:No matter argon ion laser or SDM laser is effective to keep or improve the VA in DME.After 6-month follow -up , there is no statistically significant dif ference between them.关键词
阈下微脉冲激光/氩离子激光/糖尿病性黄斑水肿Key words
argon ion laser/SDM laser/diabetic macular edema引用本文复制引用
谢婷玉,郭乔茜,王燕,王清,陈雪艺..阈下微脉冲激光与氩离子激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的临床随机对照研究[J].国际眼科杂志,2013,(12):2370-2372,3.基金项目
Fund of Urumqi Municipal Science and Technology （ No．T101310005）基金项目乌鲁木齐科技局基金 （）
