中国实用口腔科杂志Issue(10)：611-613,3.
微创与传统拔牙法拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙术后愈合情况比较研究
Comparison study of atraumatic and traditional extraction for impacted mandibular third molar
摘要
Abstract
Objective To research the healing of impacted mandibular third molar through atraumatic extraction so as to further verify the advantages of atraumatic extraction. Methods Totally 100 cases of male patients with median-leaning forward impacted mandibular third molar from September 2010 to October 2012 in Chancheng District Xiangyang Hospi-tal of Foshan were selected as experiment group and control group at random. Each group had 50 cases. For the experi-ment group,we adopted atraumatic extraction. For the control group,we used traditional extraction. Then we compared the differences in postoperative edema,pain and limited mouth opening of two groups,and observed two groups density curve of the alveolar bone in the healing process. Results For the experiment group,postoperative edema and pain rates were lower than the control group(P<0.05),the value of density change of alveolar bone was significantly higher than the control group after 4,8,12 weeks(P<0.01). The differences between two groups had statistical significance. The limited mouth opening rates in two groups had no statistical significance(P>0.05). Conclusion Atraumatic ex-traction is good for the healing of tooth socket,which is worthy of clinical popularization and application.关键词
微创拔牙/骨密度/计算机辅助设计Key words
atraumatic extraction/bone mineral density/computer aided design分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
冷颖,邬琪,段昌华,莫振飞..微创与传统拔牙法拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙术后愈合情况比较研究[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2013,(10):611-613,3.基金项目
佛山市医学科学技术研究计划课题 （）
