中国医药科学Issue(18)：121-122,2.
经股动脉和桡动脉途径行冠脉介入诊疗术比较
The comparison between the transfemoral intervention and coronary intervention treatment through radial artery
冷闰杰 1肖林2
作者信息
- 1. 新疆维吾尔自治区克拉玛依市中心医院心血管内科，新疆克拉玛依834000
- 2. 新疆维吾尔自治区石河子142团医院急诊内科，新疆石河子832047
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the feasibility and safety of the transfemoral intervention(TFI) and coronary intervention treatment through radial artery(CIRA). Methods 150 cases of coronary angiography(CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) patients who were admitted into our hospital from Jun. 2009 to Jan. 2013 were selected and treated with TFI and CIRA respectively. The first time success rate of puncture, postoperative complications and adverse situation of two groups were observed and compared. Results The time of getting out of bed, puncture sites, vascular complications, mental state and adverse situation of CIRA group were obviously superior to TFI group (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with the TFI, the CIRA has the advantage of speedy recovery rate, less complications, short hospital stay, good operation compliance and high safety, it worth to be promoted in clinical.关键词
冠状动脉造影/介入治疗/桡动脉/股动脉Key words
Coronary angiography/Intervention treatment/Radial artery/Femoral artery分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
冷闰杰,肖林..经股动脉和桡动脉途径行冠脉介入诊疗术比较[J].中国医药科学,2013,(18):121-122,2.
