中华医学图书情报杂志Issue(12)：50-54,5.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3982.2013.12.015
发表于《循证医学》的干预类系统评价／Meta分析的方法学质量分析
Methodology assessment of papers on systematic reviews and meta-analysis of interventions published in Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
石新彤 1葛龙 2安妮 1周为文 2徐俊峰 1马继春 2田金徽1
作者信息
- 1. 兰州大学循证医学中心，甘肃 兰州 730000
- 2. 兰州大学第一临床医学院，甘肃 兰州 730000
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To assess the methodology of papers on systematic reviews and meta-analysis of interventions published in Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine .Methods Basic data were extracted from 70 papers on systematic reviews and meta-analysis of interventions published in Journal of Evidence-Based Medicinefrom 2001 to 2011 .Methodology used in these papers was assessed according to the AMSTAR Scale.The data were input into the Excelland analyzed using the SPSS7.0 and Meta-Analyst software.Results The methodology used in 34 papers (48.6%) was assessed using the Cochrane bias risk assessment tools.Fund support, number of authors and their affiliated institutions did not sig-nificantly affect the total score of methodology used in the 70 papers .Conclusion The methodology used in papers on systematic reviews and meta-analysis of interventions published in Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine is not quite valid as its early design program and retrieval strategies are imperfect , and it does not provide the excluded literature list and the interest conflict.关键词
干预类/系统评价/Meta分析/AMSTAR/循证医学Key words
Intervention/Systematic reviews and meta-analysis/AMSTAR/Evidence-based medicine分类
社会科学引用本文复制引用
石新彤,葛龙,安妮,周为文,徐俊峰,马继春,田金徽..发表于《循证医学》的干预类系统评价／Meta分析的方法学质量分析[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2013,(12):50-54,5.
