中华医学图书情报杂志Issue(12)：55-60,6.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3982.2013.12.016
发表于《中华儿科杂志》的系统评价／Meta分析的报告质量和方法学质量评价
Academic level of papers on systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics and methodology they used
葛龙 1李雅睿 2曾巧铃 1王婧 3徐俊峰 1姚璐 3田金徽1
作者信息
- 1. 兰州大学循证医学中心，甘肃 兰州 730000
- 2. 兰州大学第一临床医学院
- 3. 兰州大学第二临床医学院，甘肃 兰州 730000
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To assess the academic level of papers on systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in Chinese Journal of Pediatricsand methodology they used.Methods Basic data were extracted from 13 papers on sys-tematic reviews and meta-analysis published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics .The methodology they used was assessed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) and ANSTAR Scale and analyzed using the RevMan5.0.Results The PRISMA score was 14-23.5 (mean 20.0±3.11) and the AMSTAR score was 3-7.5 (mean 6.04±1.38) for the methodology used in papers on systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics .Conclusion The methodology used in papers on systematic reviews and meta-analy-sis published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics is not quite valid and should thus be improved .关键词
中华儿科杂志/系统评价/Meta分析/PRISMA/AMSTAR/循证医学Key words
Chinese Journal of Pediatrics/Systematic review/Meta-analysis/PRISMA/AMSTAR/Evidence-based medicine分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
葛龙,李雅睿,曾巧铃,王婧,徐俊峰,姚璐,田金徽..发表于《中华儿科杂志》的系统评价／Meta分析的报告质量和方法学质量评价[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2013,(12):55-60,6.
