| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中华医学图书情报杂志|PRISMA 声明在评价《循证医学》刊载的干预类系统评价/荟萃分析报告质量中的应用

PRISMA 声明在评价《循证医学》刊载的干预类系统评价/荟萃分析报告质量中的应用

刘银春 葛龙 李雅睿 梁莉 石新彤 田金徽

中华医学图书情报杂志Issue(2):24-27,4.
中华医学图书情报杂志Issue(2):24-27,4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3982.2014.02.006

PRISMA 声明在评价《循证医学》刊载的干预类系统评价/荟萃分析报告质量中的应用

Application of PRISMA statement in assessment of intervention-related systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in Evidence-based medicine

刘银春 1葛龙 1李雅睿 2梁莉 1石新彤 1田金徽3

作者信息

  • 1. 兰州大学第一临床医学院,甘肃兰州 730000
  • 2. 兰州大学第二临床医学院,甘肃兰州 730000
  • 3. 兰州大学循证医学中心,甘肃兰州 730000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To assess the effect of PRISMA statement on intervention-related systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in Evidence-based medicine .Methods Intervention-related systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in Evidence-based medicine from 2001 to 2011 were assessed according to the PRISMA scale and analyzed by Meta Analysist software.Results Seventy intervention-related systematic reviews and meta-analyses involving 14-disease spectra were included in this study.PRISMA statement and systematic reviews and meta-analysespublished by au-thors in colleges and universities could improve their academic level (P<0.05), fund support and the number of authors showed no significant effect on their academic level.Conclusion Literature retrieval methods,literature screening methods,bias assessment methods, and other analyzing methods used systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in Evidence-based medicine and their academic level can be improved by PRISMA statement.

关键词

系统评价/Meta分析/PRISMA/循证医学/干预

Key words

Systematic review/Meta analysis/PRISMA/Evidence-based medicine/Intervention

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

刘银春,葛龙,李雅睿,梁莉,石新彤,田金徽..PRISMA 声明在评价《循证医学》刊载的干预类系统评价/荟萃分析报告质量中的应用[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2014,(2):24-27,4.

中华医学图书情报杂志

OACSTPCD

1671-3982

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文