| 注册
首页|期刊导航|河北医学|微创手术冲洗引流治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的临床研究∗

微创手术冲洗引流治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的临床研究∗

李东海 方孟秋

河北医学Issue(2):228-231,4.
河北医学Issue(2):228-231,4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2015.02.018

微创手术冲洗引流治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的临床研究∗

Minimally Invasive Surgical Irrigation and Drainage of CSDH

李东海 1方孟秋1

作者信息

  • 1. 广西壮族自治区崇左市人民医院神经外科,广西 崇左 532200
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective:To compare effect of minimally invasive surgical irrigation and drainage and tra-ditional drilling drainage on CSDH. Method:70 cases of patients with CSDH were selected and divided into research group and control group based on different surgical plans.Research group was given minimally inva-sive surgical irrigation and drainage, while control group was given traditional drilling drainage. The hemato-ma volume, pneumocephalus, drainage time, and clinical effects of both groups were observed. Result:Be-fore treatment, there was no significant difference between hematoma in both groups (P> 0.05). For re-search group, the residue amount was (11.85 ± 6.22) mL, pneumocephalus (4.34 ± 2.35) mL, and drain-age time (3.71 ± 0.66) days;for control group, the residue amount was (21.39 ± 10.70) mL, pneumoceph-alus (14.65 ± 9.68) mL, and drainage time (4.85 ± 0.80) days. The differences were statistically signifi-cant (P <0.05). The cure rate of research group was 57.14%, while 31.43% for the control group. The difference was significant ( P <0.05) . Conclusion: The clinical effect of minimally invasive surgical irriga-tion and drainage of CSDH is exact, with features of less trauma and simple operation, which can be used as preferred clinical treatment of CSDH.

关键词

微创手术冲洗引流/传统钻孔引流/慢性硬膜下血肿

Key words

Minimally invasive surgical irrigation and drainage/Traditional drilling drainage/CS-DH

引用本文复制引用

李东海,方孟秋..微创手术冲洗引流治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的临床研究∗[J].河北医学,2015,(2):228-231,4.

基金项目

广西壮族自治区崇左市科技攻关计划项目,(编号:崇科攻13090701) (编号:崇科攻13090701)

河北医学

OACSTPCD

1006-6233

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文