河北医学Issue(2):262-265,4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2015.02.029
腹腔镜手术与宫腔镜手术治疗剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的临床效果比较∗
Comparing Effect of Laparoscopic Surgery with Hysteroscopy Surgeryn Treatment of Uterine Scar Pregnancy After Cesarean Section
摘要
Abstract
Objective: To discuss the clinical curative effect hysteroscopy, laparoscopic operation for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy ( CSP ) . Method:Selected 63 cases of CSP patients from Jan. 2010 to Dec. 2013 in our hospital,according to the growth direction of pregnancy group:endogenous type (37 ca-ses) underwent hysteroscopic operation; exogenous type ( 26 cases ) underwent laparoscopic operation, to compare two groups of general information, clinical efficacy, observation and follow-up indicators. Result:General data of two groups of patients with CSP had not significant difference ( P>0.05) , it had comparable. The success rate of hysteroscopy and laparoscopy group were 100% (26/26), 91.9% (34/37) respectively, There's no statistically significant difference between two groups (P>0.05).Hysteroscopy group was signifi-cantly more than the amount of bleeding, intraoperative laparoscopic group, the operation time was long, postoperative serum beta-hCG returned to normal time and menstrual recovery time was significantly shorter, the difference had statistically significant ( P<0. 05 ) , and the hospitalization time, postoperative vaginal bleeding time difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion:For CSP,it can be hysteros-copy, laparoscopic curative effect, and each has advantages, but they are reserved for the integrity of the i-deal choice of uterus.关键词
子宫瘢痕妊娠/腹腔镜手术/宫腔镜手术/血β-hCGKey words
Uterine scar pregnancy/Laparoscopic operation/Hysteroscopic operation/Blood beta -hCG引用本文复制引用
郭亚利..腹腔镜手术与宫腔镜手术治疗剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的临床效果比较∗[J].河北医学,2015,(2):262-265,4.基金项目
北京市科学研究一般项目,(编号:B2012291) (编号:B2012291)