江汉大学学报（自然科学版）Issue(2)：70-72,3.
急性正后壁心肌梗死采用常规导联与头胸导联心电图定位诊断比较
Comparison of Head-chest Lead Electrocardiogram and Routine Lead Electrocardiogram on Diagnosis of Acute Posterior Wall Myocardial Infarction
胡颖1
作者信息
- 1. 江汉大学 附属医院心电图室，湖北 武汉 430015
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective For acute posterior wall myocardial infarction patients and healthy people, compared the routine lead ECG with head-chest lead ECG on diagnosis. Methods 36 acute poste-rior wall myocardial infarction patients and 52 healthy people were selected. Routine lead ECG and head-chest lead ECG were recorded simultaneously,and then the two kinds of ECG results were contrasted with coronarography confirmed diagnosis. The confirmed rates and false positive rates of diagnosis based on routine lead ECG and head-chest lead ECG were calculated by χ2 test. Results For routine lead ECG and head-chest lead ECG,the confirmed rate were 88. 8% and 97. 22% in 36 patients of acute posterior wall myocardial infarction,and the false positive rate were 13. 4%and 3. 85%in 52 healthy people. There is a significant statistical difference(P<0. 05). Conclusion Head-chest lead ECG is better than routine lead ECG in the diagnosis of acute posteri-or wall myocardial infarction. It is worthy of clinical popularization.关键词
急性正后壁心肌梗死/常规12导联心电图/头胸导联心电图Key words
acute posterior wall myocardial infarction/routine lead ECG/head-chest lead ECG分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
胡颖..急性正后壁心肌梗死采用常规导联与头胸导联心电图定位诊断比较[J].江汉大学学报（自然科学版）,2014,(2):70-72,3.
